Gravitational Waves, Gravity, Cosmology, Machine Learning, Data Analysis, Dark Energy
Codes:
PTAfast: PTA correlations from stochastic gravitational wave background cosmo-learn: code for learning cosmology using different methods and mock data gp6: Gaussian Processes for Physics - designed for late time cosmology with noisy & correlated data Selected Papers:
2604.08373.2503.07244].2409.07955].2306.13593].2111.08289].Full publication list at Inspire HEP, ORCID, and Google Scholar, or my CV.
I study what the nanohertz gravitational wave sky and the timing of pulsars can tell us about gravity and the Universe. A pulsar timing array turns the Galaxy into a gravitational wave detector, but a faint correlated signal buried in irregular timing data is only as trustworthy as our understanding of the processes that shape the data. My work addresses both sides of this problem: how gravity and cosmology imprint themselves on the correlations between pulsars, and how the stochastic behavior of the pulsars themselves must be modeled before a signal can be claimed.
My path to this question went through gravity and cosmology. I started with theories of gravity beyond general relativity, studying self-tuning and well-tempered cosmologies and black holes and their perturbations in Horndeski theories, and then turned to data-driven reconstructions of the expansion history with Gaussian processes and approximate Bayesian computation. These threads share one habit and asks what a model predicts, then what the data can actually support. Pulsar timing arrays are a natural place to apply it, because the cosmology lives in the correlations and the statistics are the experiment.
In pulsar timing, my work has followed the signal from prediction to test: inter-pulsar correlations beyond the Hellings-Downs curve, including non-Einsteinian polarizations; the pulsar and cosmic variances of these correlations; simulations of Gaussian background signals; and tests of whether the background is Gaussian. More recently I have turned to the pulsar side, namely spin noise, stationarity, angular momentum conservation, and the non-stationarity that observations themselves induce in timing residuals. Non-stationarity is not a flaw to be hidden; it is a property of the data that has to be identified and interpreted, and it bears directly on how well arrays can separate astrophysical noise from a gravitational wave background.
A promising direction is to bring the cosmological and the pulsar sides into one statistical framework, so that a detection, a non-detection, and a test of gravity all rest on the same model of the data. I also develop open-source tools for this work, such as PTAfast and cosmo-learn, and I enjoy mentoring students who are learning to do the same.
Languages: English (fluent), Filipino (mother tongue)
Coding: Command Line, Python, Mathematica, LaTeX
Referee: PRL, PRD, JCAP, CQG, Phys. Dark Universe, EPJC, Astron. Comput., MNRAS, ApJ, MPLA, Chinese J. Phys., Sci. Rep., GRG, JKPS, Proceedings of the Physics Society of the Philippines, Philippine Journal of Science
Editor: Proceedings of the Physics Society of the Philippines
Member: CosmoVerse COST Action—Data Analysis and Fundamental Physics Working Groups; SKAO—Pulsars and Cosmology Science Working Groups